[work in progress...] Within the context of complex human-environmental systems - the interaction of bio-physical and social-economic systems - current projects are linked by common methodological approaches and research themes including improving sustainability, understanding resilience, mapping dynamic responses. Our more theoretical projects are related to understanding the properties of components within the larger systems we study.
Marine fisheries - POSEIDON model
Ocean plastic pollution - P2O model
Multiple stressors in marine environments - OSIRIS model
Sustainable agriculture - Tellus model
Heritage conservation - ViSTa+
Stability of Ecological systems
Emergence of complex systems
OSIRIS - Ocean Systems Interactions, Risks, Instabilities and Synergies
Marine biological communities are affected by a combination of changes that affects their composition and ecosystem functioning and services in a significant way. While habitat destruction and overfishing are critical and immediate short-term threats, there is growing concern that changes in underlying global ocean conditions (e.g. water temperature changes, acidification due to increased climate change effects) will combine with these local/regional direct drivers to push marine systems to new, and potentially dysfunctional, states.
Much work on single species, or particular groups (e.g. corals), have been done to increase knowledge of how individual stressors (such as acidification) impacts these organisms. In particular, the empirical advances in our understanding of combined multiple stressors’ influence have shown that the combinations of stressors are not always additive(f(A) + f(B) = f(A+B), but can be antagonistic, where the sum of the effects is less than expected based on the estimated single effects (f(A) + f(B) > f(A + B)), or synergistic (f(A) + f(B) < f(A + B)), where the sum of the effects is larger than expected based on the estimated single effects. However, most of these studies consider pair-wise stressors, while natural systems rarely experience just two combined stressors; it is assumed that more than two stressors generally result in (stronger) synergistic effects. Recognising and incorporating these types of effects are important due to their consequences for species/groups’ performance and survival. However, controlled experiments varying two or more stressors and studying the effects on survival and fitness are difficult if not impossible for some species. It is impossible to do these experiments for whole ecological communities, where changes in relative abundance and biomass can result in changes in species interactions and mitigate or amplify environmental changes. These changes can have large-scale consequences in coastal and oceanic communities and the ecosystem services they provide for people.
It is unlikely that multifactor, controlled experiments can be implemented for multispecies or whole ecological communities. To supplement the empirical work, there is a strong need for an effective analytical framework to quantify the role of multiple stressors and to evaluate the consequences of interacting climate and non-climate stressors in marine systems. If synergistic effects prove to have large ecosystem consequences, an additional level of caution in how we manage our oceans will likely be warranted. Furthermore, if synergies are common and important, international carbon dioxide emissions targets (set at 2˚C) may still be too high to maintain ocean functionality. In response to these needs, we have developed a new model framework (OSIRIS – Ocean Systems Interactions, Risks, Instabilities and Synergies) to help explore possible system-level consequences of multiple external environmental forcings.
Example results: the harmful effects of increased
synergies and noise in forcing
An example modelled ecosystem
We currently are using OSIRIS in two ecosystems, the California Current System in the eastern Pacific, and the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas in the Pacific Arctic. Both projects investigate tipping points and system resilience, and incorporate (local) policy effects to mitigate or slow-down system changes. This project is run in close collaboration with Ocean Conservancy, along with Centre for Ocean Solutions at Stanford University.
Group members involved:
Richard Bailey, Jesse van der Grient
This work is being undertaken in close collaboration with partners at SYSTEMIQ Ltd and Pew, and has the aim of developing a global roadmap for reducing leakage of plastics to the oceans to near zero by 2040. Our role in this work is to support the data analysis and model development for the assessment of economically feasible solutions.
Group members involved:
Richard Bailey, Toby Pilditch
Identifying robust policies against deforestation
Agriculture is one of the main drivers of deforestation, which contributes to carbon emissions and biodiversity loss. Finding ways to increase the productivity of agriculture on the same amount of land while protecting areas of existing forest can bring economic benefits and reduce deforestation. My work focuses on understanding agricultural production systems, particularly for high-value cash crops, and encoding these systems in computational simulations. It is possible to use these simulations to test the effect of different policies such as increasing fertilizer use and mechanization affect the profitability of agriculture and the pattern of deforestation. The simulations can also test the influence of uncertainties such as commodity prices on policy outcomes. As a result, decision makers can identify optimal policies which are robust to uncertainties. The advantage to a simulation is that it lets decision makers test these policies in advance before making financial commitments, and avoid potentially costly mistakes. I am also exploring how new data from satellites, drones, and sensors, as well as the application of machine learning algorithms to these data can inform these simulations. See the videos below for an example simulation and more about the methods.
This work is funded by the Green Templeton College DPhil Scholarship.
Group members involved:
Adam Formica, Richard Bailey, Richard Grenyer
Optimization of anti-poaching measures
Poaching of African elephants Loxodonta africana is one of today’s most
pressing and widely-publicized conservation issues. The international
demand for ivory – a substance so valuable it is sometimes referred to as
‘white gold’ – has led to the rapid decline of many elephant populations.
There are numerous controversies and uncertainties surrounding elephant
poaching and the ivory trade, and debates on how to mitigate the poaching
crisis continue to the present day.
Agent-based models are promising tools to both inform decision-making
and improve our understanding of elephant poaching, because they acc-
ount for the complex and dynamic interplays between elephants, poachers,
and law enforcement. This project explores how various policy and manage-
ment interventions affect levels of poaching. With this model, we hope to
structure the debate around this complex and controversial issue, and help
guide future research or policymaking. This model could also be adapted
in the future to fit the specific conditions of a particular park or country, thus
providing greater insights into the potential outcomes of different
Group members involved: Emily Neil, Richard Bailey, Ernesto Carrella, Jens Koed Madsen
Desert landscape evolution and stability
Dryland regions are characterised by patchy vegetation, erodible surfaces and erosive aeolian processes. These components of the dryland system interact dynamically through a variety of feedbacks. Wind erosion models play a key role in simplifying wind flow and sediment transport processes on partly vegetated surfaces. However, most existing models do not recognise the heterogeneous nature of vegetated desert surfaces; those that do are often computationally expensive to run.
The dryland system in its simplified form.
To fill this gap, we developed the cellular automaton Vegetation and Sediment Transport model (ViSTA), which couples a sophisticated vegetation distribution model with a sediment transport model. This allows us to explicitly link vegetation growth, wind flow dynamics and sediment flux over any dryland surface. ViSTA requires only a few simple inputs, and can be forced with a variety of climate and land use change scenarios, to characterise possible transition scenarios between environmental states. Since vegetated semi-arid landscapes are often used for pastoralism, agriculture and habitation, the model output has direct relevance to land management policies in some of the world’s most vulnerable environments.
Examples of model output.
This project was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council. The full ViSTA model code is freely available on GitHub.
Group members involved:
Jerome Mayaud (co-supervised with Prof. Giles Wiggs), Richard Bailey
Stability of mutualistic ecological systems
Conserving ecosystem function and associated services requires deep understanding of the underlying basis of system stability. While the study of ecological dynamics is a mature and diverse field, the lack of a general model that predicts a broad range of theoretical and empirical observations has allowed unresolved contradictions to persist. In this work we provide a general model of mutualistic ecological interactions between two groups and show for the first time how the conditions for bi-stability, the nature of critical transitions, and identifiable leading indicators in time-series can be derived from the basic parameters describing the underlying ecological interactions. Strong mutualism and nonlinearity in handling-time are found to be necessary conditions for the occurrence of critical transitions. We used the model to resolve open questions concerning the effects of heterogeneity in inter-species interactions on both resilience and abundance, and discuss these in terms of potential trade-offs in real systems. This framework provides a basis for rich investigations of ecological system dynamics, and may be generalisable across many ecological contexts.
For further details see Feng & Bailey (2018).
This project was funded by the University of Oxford John Fell Fund.
Project now complete - Group members involved
Wenfeng Feng, Richard Bailey, Kirsty McGregor